Template index
Choose the business model first.
Each frame is a fictional design concept. Regulatory language, registration details, broker relationships and risk warnings must be reviewed for the operator and jurisdiction before launch.
Shared system
Consistent foundations.
Conditional modules.
The portfolio shares a disclosure-aware information architecture, while enabling only the modules the business genuinely needs. “Dual-track” navigation is useful when both traders and partners are real audiences—not as a decorative default.
Design principles
Compliance is a layout constraint, not a footer.
“The studio has one voice so the templates can each have their own.”
- 01
Name the relationship.
Identify the operator, the broker relationship and who holds the account. Never let visual polish blur the parties involved.
- 02
Put risk beside the claim.
Performance, income and access claims need visible assumptions, methodology and risk context—not a disclaimer several screens later.
- 03
Design for the actual audience.
Retail education, institutional consultation, technical system evaluation and partner recruitment require different evidence.
- 04
Keep integrations replaceable.
Calendars, comparisons, account links and partner widgets sit in explicit slots so the front end does not depend on one provider.
- 05
Publish the downside.
Dissent, decline criteria, the losing tape and the stressed scenario are one principle expressed through four different systems.
The complete bench
Four voices. One exacting standard.
Modernist dissent, private-ledger selectivity, terminal loss records and a poster calculator that argues back. Each concept publishes the part its category usually hides.
Open the index